Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Final Reflection for EDUC-66711I-1 Bridging Learning Theory and Technology

Created at abcya.com/wordcloud/ 
     As my fifth Walden class, EDUC-66711I-1 Bridging Learning Theory and Technology comes to a close, it is time to reflect on how my personal theory of learning has changed since writing it during the first week of this course.  I can't say that my personal theory of learning has changed much, if at all through this course, but I have learned new ways to integrate technology to make learning meaningful and engaging for my students.  
    In my own classroom I incorporate a variety of learning theories and teaching techniques to meet my students' unique needs and to increase the number of times students are exposed to the content.  I put great effort into teaching math concepts to my students using a variety of strategies such as modeling, explaining, using music and kinesthetic movements, along with scaffolding learning to meet the multiple intelligences of the students in my classroom.  I agree with Dr. Patricia Wolfe who states, "The more modalities you use to enter information into the brain, the more avenues you have to retrieve it"  (Laureate Education Inc., 2011 Brain Research).
The learning theory I most closely relate to is the constructivist theory.  It states that knowledge is unique to the individual who constructs it and it relies on the cognitive concepts of inquiry-based learning and social interaction (Lever-Duffy & McDonald, 2008).  Although this is the theory I relate to most, I have found it challenging the past few years to utilize it in my teaching due to changing standards, time limits, and switching grades.  I have had the personal goal to work towards creating more hands-on experiences based on my fifth grade math students' interests to allow them to interact with the content and construct their own meaning.  "Lessons in which students are engaged and invested in goals they helped to create have potential to stimulate and restimulate networks of new memories as students actively process information in the construction of knowledge"  (Willis, 2008, p. 427).
Although I already valued the use of technology in the classroom, this class has supported my opinion that technology plays an important role in the classroom.  "Technology is best viewed as a robust set of instructional tools that help you accomplish the objectives of the teaching-learning process" (Lever-Duffy, & McDonald, 2008, p. 9).  Technology should allow us to do different things instead of just doing things differently.
Research shows that we are limited to approximately seven pieces of information to process at any given time (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011).  Technology can facilitate the learning process by allowing students to focus on the content.  For example, spreadsheets allow students to focus on the solution of a problem allowing for more accurate comparisons instead of expending all of their energy towards accessing the data or making complex calculations.  By participating in a WebQuest students can focus on the content instead of the process of finding the information.  
This course introduced me to a variety of new ways to include technology to enhance my lessons including voice threads, blogs, podcasts, concept maps, virtual field trips, and simulations.  I also attended a conference at the Indiana Association for the Gifted and learned effective uses of voice thread, iMovie, and prezi.  I was most fascinated by how the presenter at the conference uses voice thread as the way his students submit work.  This allows him to grade essays at home without taking home stacks of papers and it also creates somewhat of a portfolio of his students' work, including his video comments.  Although it will take some time to fully implement each of these new technologies in my classroom, I strive to utilize each of these in the coming years, and found myself once again, excited about teaching.  
Our text, Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works focuses on nine clusters of instructional strategies.  These strategies are:  identifying similarities and differences, summarizing and note taking, reinforcing effort and providing recognition, homework and practice, nonlinguistic representation, cooperative learning, setting objectives and providing feedback, generating and testing hypotheses, and cues, questions, and advance organizers.  These are common strategies that are utilized in every classroom but are not effective unless students are proficient in using them.  According to the research, identifying similarities and differences was the instructional strategies witha percentile gain of 45 points and Marzano's original meta-analysis, using graphic representation had one of the highest impacts on student achievement (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, Malenoski, 2007).  As a result, I plan to focus on utilizing nonlinguistic representations, and identifying similarities and differences, along with cooperative learning in my classroom.  Once my students and I have mastered these, I intend to extend my focus to some of the other instructional strategies.  
The immediate changes I will make is incorporating and focusing on the mastery of nonlinguistic representations and identifying similarities.  I will also use our Edmodo site as a collaboration tool.  The last few months of school my students and I dabbled with Edmodo and learning of its uses in the classroom.  I posted links and assignments but the students were not using it for classroom discussions.  I would love to use this as a tool to get students to communicate their thinking and to reflect on how what we are learning applies to real life.  "Research indicates that online discussions have numerous advantages-such as promoting students' critical thinking and knowledge construction, and improving students' relationships" (Wang, 2008).  "It is the conversations that the students engage in that really help concretize and help them understand something"  (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011b).
The resources throughout this course have inspired me to improve my teaching by incorporating more technology, so selecting only two long term goals seems very limiting.  Two things I would love to use in my classroom are simulations and robots.  However, it is hard to find math simulations at the elementary level for anything other than money based economic activities, and we simply don't have the funding to purchase robot kits or the software to program them.  So, at this point I would say that my two goals will be promoting technology with colleagues, parents, and our technology department and creating an online math journal or notebook.  
As an educator, it is not only important to utilize technology in the classroom, it is also crucial to be an advocate for educational technology.  Colleagues, and parents need to be shown how the new technologies actually enhance learning.  They need to see how it enables students to do different things that would not be possible without the use of technology.  In addition to colleagues and parents, some technology departments also need some convincing about technologies that are appropriate for students.  For example, our tech representative made the comment to me, "Why do kids need to access the cameras built in the netbooks?"  I was shocked!  I immediately rattled off a number of ways this can be a beneficial learning tool including skyping with experts, or other classes, collaboration, demonstrating knowledge for those who struggle with writing papers or performing in front of the class, and for the creation of voice threads.  
For years I have been trying to figure out how to incorporate math journals in my classroom, but have not found a way to make them organized or fun.  During this class I came up with the idea of having students create an online math journal by creating a group wiki.  This will allow them to add pictures, links to videos or games, and it will allow them to organize the information neatly.  Students can create a page for each standard, such as number sense, or data analysis, and will be able to manipulate the information with ease.  It will also allow them to access the content, provided they have internet access, instead of being out of luck when working on homework and their journal is in their desk at school.  
"Teaching is a systematic, planned sequence of events that facilitates the communication of an idea, concept, or skill to a learner.  The act of teaching requires an understanding of learning and an understanding of the individual and environmental factors that affects the learner" (Orey, 2001).  To best meet our students needs teachers need to incorporate a variety of learning theories, instructional strategies, and technologies in the classroom.  They also need to change their view of mastery from students working independently, to allowing students to collaborate to solve complex problems and construct artifacts.  "To be prepared for the fast-paced, virtual workplace that they will inherit, today's students need to be able to learn and produce cooperatively"  ("Pitler, et al, 2007, 139)


References
 Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011a).  Program eight:  Social learning theories [Video webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology.   Retrieved from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn 


 Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011b). Program two: Brain research and learning [Video webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology. Retrieved from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1 


Lever-Duffy, J., & McDonald, J.  (2008)  Theoretical foundations (Laureate Education, Inc. custom ed.).  Boston, MA:  Pearson Education, Inc.  


Orey, M. (Ed.).  (2001).  Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.  Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Main_Page 


Pitler H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. 


Willis, J. (2008, February). Building a bridge from neuroscience to the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan89(6), 424–427. Retrieved using the Academic Search Complete database.